Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship
The apparent increase in research misconduct in the scientific literature has caused considerable alarm in both the biomedical (Benos et al., 2005; Smith, 2006) and psychological research communities (Stroebe et al., 2012). An understanding of research misconduct must be informed by the recognition that the norms of science might be quite general (e.g., Merton, 1942; Bronowski, 1965), ambiguous...
متن کاملEthical Considerations of Authorship
INTRODUCTION Publication is the final affirmation of scholarly accomplishment. Academic advancement, “publish or perish,” as well as prestige, are other important driving forces. There are many financial benefits (direct and indirect) in publishing such as promotion and further research funding. Many of these forces can lead to ethical lapses. All authors have several important ethical obligati...
متن کاملSocial, ethical and legal barriers to E-health
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Information technology such as electronic medical records (EMRs), electronic prescribing and decision support systems are recognized as essential tools in Europe, the U.S., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. But significant barriers impede wide-scale adoption of these tools, especially EMR systems. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to investigate the present...
متن کاملAuthorship: an ethical dilemma of science.
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE The scientific and technological progress that has taken place since the 1960s has brought an ever-growing volume of scientific research, and inflation in co-authorship. Over this period, it has been observed that an increasing number of publications have listed authors or co-authors whose participation in the published research was minimal or even nonexistent. The objecti...
متن کاملCooperative Authorship Social Network
This paper introduces a set of challenges for developing a dissemination service over a Web collaborative network. We define specific metrics for working on a co-authorship research social network. As a case study, we build such a network using those metrics and compare it to a manually built one. Specifically, once we build a collaborative network and verify its quality, the overall effectiven...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Psychology
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1664-1078
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877